Clint Eastwood Inflicts 6 Million Damages in CBD Dispute | Celebrity

Clint Eastwood has won a $ 6.1 million proceeding against a CBD seller.

A 91-year-old director has filed a proceeding against Mediatonas UAB for unauthorized promotion of the product using his name and portrait. Currently, a California judge has ruled against a Lithuanian company by default after they did not respond. Summon in March.

The companies that own the rights to his portrait, Clint and Garapata, have been awarded $ 6 million in damages and $ 95,000 to cover legal fees, as well as the name or image of the director of “Million Dollar Baby.” Obtained a permanent injunction for future use. society.

The “Dirty Harry” actor filed two proceedings from many CBD companies last year. He accused him of falsely claiming to have approved his product.

The document submitted in July 2020 states: “In fact, Eastwood has nothing to do with CBD products and has never done such an interview.

“Mr. Eastwood is trying to unfairly create this plan, disseminate false and malicious factual statements about him, and hold individuals and groups who have illegally benefited from his name and portrait. . “

The second proceeding, targeting many businesses and individuals, used programming code to insert his name in a hidden tag to send an online search to his web page.

The proceedings stated: “By using Eastwood’s name in the hidden meta tag, the defendant metaphorically posted a sign bearing the Eastwood trademark in front of the online store to attract customers, and Eastwood to consumers. Made him believe that he was associated and / or approved … the defendant’s CBD product if such an association did not actually exist …

“Like many of his most famous characters, Mr. Eastwood is not afraid to confront cheating and blames those who illegally profit from his name and portrait.”

And the movie’s legendary statutory agent warned fans to be “cautious” about celebrity recommendations.

His lawyer, Nolan Heymann, previously said:

“The purpose of these proceedings is to stop and correct ongoing defamation and misappropriation breaches, but it also serves to alert customers if they see the support of a celebrity who is too good. increase.”